During which step of writing is peer-conferencing utilized?

Peer-conferencing is primarily utilized during the revising step of the writing process. This stage focuses on improving the content, organization, and clarity of a written piece based on feedback from peers. During peer-conferencing, writers exchange drafts and discuss various aspects of their work, allowing them to provide constructive criticism and suggestions for enhancement. This collaborative dialogue fosters critical thinking and helps writers consider different perspectives, leading to richer and more effective revisions.

In contrast, the drafting stage is where initial ideas are put down, and while peer input can be beneficial, it is more focused on refining rather than revising. The publishing stage involves preparing the final version of a piece for distribution, which is usually less about feedback and more about presentation. Proofreading and editing are primarily concerned with correcting errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, rather than making broader content-related changes based on peer feedback. Thus, the revising step is where peer-conferencing plays a crucial role in shaping the final outcome of a written work.